Here we begin to explore how the 12 GPP's might be structured, and trained.
# Note
My first thought is that we should reserve the term juror for humans. Rather than juror we shoud be considering Robot Judges. See: - Robot Judges
# Twelve Lenses
First Thought: the 12 GPP Jurors (personas as *lenses*, not gimmicks). See: - Judicial Lensses
> Each juror returns a structured opinion (see “Outputs”) with short rationale.
1. Safety Lens — Hygiene and health risk assessment; proximity, crowd density. 2. Accessibility Lens — Medical exceptions (respiratory issues, spitting into a tissue), dignity protections. 3. Equity Lens — Fairness and bias checks; consistency with past similar cases. 4. Evidence Lens — evidence quality; tampering; “insufficient basis” calls. 5. Context Lens — weather, surfaces, distance from others, signage visibility. 6. Restorative Lens — remedies: warning, apology, cleanup, education. 7. Precedent Keeper — retrieves analogous cases and outcomes. 8. Norms Lens — Community and local customs; multilingual signage adequacy. 9. Harms Lens — Care Ledger records obligations (cleanup, sanitation). 10. Boundary Lens — Policy matches rule text; checks formal authority and limits. 11. Stakeholder Lens — surfaces concerns of affected (minority) groups. 12. Procedural Lens - "Foreperson" aggregates, flags disagreements, drafts summary.